Friends of Mosman Park Bushland ideas for responding to the Greening Perth to Peel survey FoMPB

Go to link: Urban Greening (jotform.com) and use the below tips to assist you respond.

Q 1. Self explanatory

Q 2. Select all those that apply

Q 3. On the scale 1 to 10 – select ‘1’ then in the text box for additional comment use info such as:

We have the lowest canopy cover of a capital city in Australia. We need 30% connected biodiverse canopy cover for our health and the planet’s health.

Perth is losing biodiversity and canopy cover, which  UN classify as a violation of humans right to a healthy environment. It is being lost due to:

1)        Clearing for new housing developments

2)        Subdivision of existing blocks for urban infill housing

3)        Polyphagus shot hole borer is killing over 1000 mature trees in Perth in one year

4)        Salt water incursion of ground water (coastal) and dropping water tables from over extraction

5)        Drying and heating climate

6)        Too frequent fires in bushland (Matter of National Environmental Significance)

7)        Weed invasion

8)        Clearing of unofficial tracks in bush reserves

Q 4. On the scale 1 to 10 – select ‘10’ then in the text box for additional comment use info such as:

The need is urgent! If we don’t address the need to have connected nature nearby for liveability,  the cost to remediate will only cost more in the future.

Often cited are the following international figures: 3, 30, 300 – being able to see 3 trees from our house, to live with 30% tree canopy and be within 300m of nature.

Greening needs to be locally viable species that support nature, hence waterwise. Verges are often the only place a large tree has space to grow, yet, in new housing estates, even these are too small.

Q 5. All points are important so choose the priority order for you. In the available text box include any further comment.

Q 6. Select what applies re the “urban heat island effect”.

 

Q 7.  On the scale 1 to 10 – select ‘3’ (or another low score).

Q 7a. State Mosman Park – assuming you are responding as a resident of Mosman Park.

 

Q 8. Select ‘Yes’ 

Q 9. Select all that apply. Take care not to check ‘We don’t need more trees’.

In the text box add any further comment; eg Natural areas for canopy cover and ecosystem function

Q 10, 11, 12 and 12a complete as appropriate to your situation.

 

Q 13. Text box for further comment about anything else you would like to say about trees in your nominated suburb or Perth and Peel. Use any or all of the below:

Town of Mosman Park (ToMP) has 15.8% tree canopy. The Town calculates we need to plant 2100 trees each year to reach 30% tree canopy by 2040, which would mean a rate rise of 8%. This is unlikely to happen!

The Town has calculated that we have not left enough public open space to even achieve 30% canopy cover, even if all streets and POS were 100% canopy covered.

More generally, Perth has 18% canopy cover, which means we have either not left sufficient room for canopy cover or our conservation areas (30%) are in a very degraded state.

The United Nations says that the biggest threat to mankind is loss of biodiversity and functioning ecosystems.

Therefore, the State Government must take action for our health and wellbeing to honour the United Nations Kunming Montreal International commitment to protect 30% of land for Biodiversity and Ecosystems by:

1)        Legislating for 30% tree canopy by 2040

2)        Allowing no further clearing of bush reserves and their linkages

3)        Retention of 30% canopy cover on private land for redevelopment

4)        100% canopy cover of all possible public open space, including verges with native planting to support, preferably, local trees.

5)        Not allowing further infrastructure in public open space unless it can be 100% tree canopy covered, if it is not in a cleared area for organised sport

6)        Revegetating all bush reserves and conservation areas to 100% 3m canopy cover if it is not riparian vegetation, such as saltmarshes and sedgelands

7)        Banning new domestic bores in suburbs that have saltwater incursion from over extraction of freshwater or where superficial water table is dropping and reviewing all bore use agreements

8)        Paying for suburbs’ transition to underground power

9)        Taking urgent action to stop arson and fires from spreading through bushland e.g. fences, , grassy weed control, arson watch, quick response to fire

10)   Supporting DBCA and community volunteer groups to restore remnant bushland and their ecological linkages

11)   Acquiring all private bushland in Perth, starting with Bush Forever and linkages to Bush Forever for conservation protection.

Q 14. Select all that apply, then in the text box for additional comment under ‘Other’ use the below. Addition to education is:

1) How to make verge trees resilient to a drying and heating climate

2) The importance of improving soil health

3) By planting local tree species suited to your conditions, you will nurture local wildlife, birds and insects to strengthen ecosystems so we become less reliant on dangerous chemicals

4) Native verge plantings under your street tree further nurture insects, birds and lizards, and which are hardier to local conditions than lawn. Native plantings will even help your verge tree survive by feeding soil microbes to the roots, which can then share water and nutrients between plants in times of need. Soil microbes supply essential trace elements to their mother plants. Artificial fertilisers reduce good soil microbes causing sickness in plants as artificial fertilisers are unable to supply all trace elements that our native plants need.

5) How to make a wildlife friendly garden using local plants on a shoe string budget.

 

Q 15. Add any example/s you are aware of.

Go to DPLH consultation Page 

Before the 26th April 2022 and say "NO" the foreshore must remain public land !

Risks of the Proposed Rezoning Lot 556 Curtin Avenue, Cottesloe (The McCall Centre)

Introduction

The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is seeking comment on the rezoning of Lot 556 Curtin Avenue in Cottesloe and Mosman Park from Public Purposes- Special Uses reservation to the Urban zone in the Metropolitan Regional Scheme (MRS).  The rezoning is intended to allow for the sale and redevelopment of the site, as it is currently stated to be ‘surplus to government requirements’.

It is strongly recommended that the rezoning does not take place. 

Rezoning the land has significant risks in the short. medium and long term.

The four main risks of rezoning Lot 556 Curtin Avenue to urban include: 

1)      Short term and long term loss of social value.

2)      Economic risks: Loss of the opportunity to develop a tourism gem and risks to transit and communications corridors.

3)      Contrary to historic and strategic planning outcomes and successional government approach.

4)      Grave loss of habitat for endangered species

Short and Long-term loss of social value

 

The MRS rezoning report for Lot 556 makes an unqualified statement that their coastal hazard setback assessment shows that lot 556 is unlikely to be impacted within 100 years.

The coastal foreshore should be assessed on a regional scale and consider the coastal erosion impact for all of the beaches, Cable Station Beach to Port Beach². Erosion from storms is already significantly impacting beach use and access.

Lot 556 is within the coastal foreshore reserve¹. The accepted set back zone recommended is 125 meters[1] from the highwater mark. This is a setback that offers a buffer against future coastal erosion processes and should not be built on. Lot 556 starts at just 60m from the high tide mark of an already eroding Mosman Beach. Between the western side of Curtin Avenue and the highwater mark there is as little as 40 meters.

 

This coastal area has very high social value to the Western Australian community generally, as recognized in SPP2.6 (Coastal Planning) and as listed in the 2016 community coastal users survey[2].

The Leighton, Port and Mosman Beach Coastal Adaption plan says (pg 17) that the 7 highest social values for the Foreshore included:

1.       Ability to access and enjoy a beach setting (coastal amenity)

2.       Ability to enjoy coastal scenery and views (coastal amenity)

3.       The amenity of the open, coastal character of the area, compared to built up coastal settlements (such as Cottesloe and Scarborough

4.       Ability to exercise in the coastal environment (recreational)

5.       Coastal vegetation and habitat (coastal amenity)

6.       Ability to access bicycle and pedestrian facilities (recreational)

7.       Ability to access car parking and toilet facilities

The MRS report does not consider the negative consequences to local public amenity of an urban development at Lot 556 for coastal users.

This community survey states that 83% of coastal users want the coastal processes managed by way of landward retreat so that this coastal area is always accessible for recreation. An urban development in the foreshore reserve of Lot 556 is contrary to the recommended management of Mosman Beach coastal processes.

There has been considerable public and community protest in response to proposed development of land in this area (see Attachment 2) with preservation and management of natural bushland and green spaces a high priority.  These prolonged community actions further demonstrate that this area is highly valued by the community.

The green link is also an important part of the Swan Coastal Plain landscape that is significant to the culture and identity of the Whadjuk people, the traditional owners and custodians of this area.

The increase in population density from this development, along with the planned multistorey developments nearby at One Steel and Matilda Bay Brewery on the border of Mosman Park and North Fremantle, will  increase the pressure on the natural amenity of the area as well as parking which is already at capacity.

With greater densification comes the added responsibility for state and local governments to retain and create compensatory natural areas for the physical and psychological well-being of the community, the benefits of which have been well documented.[3] This has been highlighted during the Covid pandemic.

In the longer term, predicted coastal erosion will likely have extreme[4] (pg41) consequences causing unacceptable loss of social, recreational and heritage values of regional significance. Vehicular access for the Cable station is at extreme risk⁴(pg 44).

As the Cable Station is in the foreshore reserve, It is recognized that the best long term use of it would be  to provide recreation related facilities such as a café/restaurant and or a visitors centre.

State Planning Policy 2.6 stresses the importance of considering coastal processes in consideration of development[5].

The Coastal Hazard and Erosion Map shows that in as little as 25 years, the ocean could be at Curtin Avenue because of the steep man-made dune elevation.  Our Coastal Future: Leighton, Port and Mosman Beaches Coastal Adaptation Plan[6] forecasts the need for interim protection and likely retreat from the coast by 2050.  In the long term this means there is unlikely to be car parking or a beach access road for Lot 556.

 

Notably, State Planning Policy (SPP) 2.6[7] sets out a case against this loss of amenity, stating that in order to act in the public interest, the Government must support public ownership of the coast, including where appropriate the provision of a coastal foreshore reserve and accommodation of regional and local recreational needs.
Therefore, in conclusion, the loss of short, medium and long term amenity and coastal recreation value presents an unacceptable risk to the State Government of rezoning Lot 556 Curtin Avenue to enable development.  The rezoning should not take place as it is inconsistent with SPP 2.6.

Economic Risk: Loss of opportunity to create a highly attractive tourism precinct for Western Australia

The Tourism Opportunity

Perth and Peel @3.5 million highlights the value of tourism as a key part of the State’s economy in the future[8]. Lot 556 Curtin Avenue is a critical link between four historic sites that would constitute a valuable tourism attraction if appropriately managed, being: 

1.       the foreshore is the site of Vlamingh’s landing in Western Australia,

2.       the foreshore is also the site of the Noongar shark dreaming, 

3.       the Cable Station, and

4.       the historic World War II Tunnels (behind the site).

Development and promotion of these assets under a well-managed program would create a revenue-generating tourism asset, stimulate the local economy, create jobs and attract more people to enjoy and appreciate the amenity of the area including understanding the Noongar connection.  Allowing the rezoning and development of the land destroys this opportunity.

The Vlamingh Memorial, located between the ocean and Lot 556 Curtin Avenue, marks the approximate area that 83 of the Dutch crew of Vlamingh’s fleet first landed on the Perth coast.  From here they discovered the River and encountered Black Swans, earning the river its name.

The area is rich in Aboriginal History. The rock formations below Lot 556 are known as Moondarup, described by the South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council  as  the Spiritual Gateway of the area.[9] The seven sister hills  created by the Noongar Waarkal look out over Lot 556 to the ocean as does  Dwerda (dingo) . Whadjuk tools have been discovered beside the Cable Station, Victoria Street Station and near Warton Street indicating widespread habitation in this locality.

The EPA raised the alarm of the impact of an urban development on the Aboriginal heritage values here without a suggested way forward.

The heritage listed Cable Station, built in 1926 to house the families who monitored the ‘red line’ submarine telegraph cable linking the British Empire 24/7. The house is a fine architectural example of the era.

Behind the site, on the top of Buckland Hill are the tunnels.  400m of tunnels were carved out of limestone, in places 10 m deep, to enable a safeguard look-out and artillery to protect the Port of Fremantle and Perth during World War II.  The tunnels are currently operated by volunteers and are a well frequented tourist attraction.

If we preserve the amenity of the green space, link up these four major historical and heritage sites, there is an incredible opportunity to create a tourism precinct, supporting the economy through a hospitality venue and interpretative centre, enduring economic and social value to the community. This will also ensure the amenity of the area prevails, even if the coastline erodes as forecast.

Contrary to historic and strategic planning outcomes and government approach

 

The proposed Amendment is contrary to the most fundamental planning principles informing the development of this area.  The principle aims of the Town of Mosman Park Local Planning Scheme 3[10]  include (section 9 (l):

to encourage the establishment of an ecological corridor on Wellington Street linking the Indian Ocean to the Swan River via plantings and related treatments within the public realm;

The proposed rezoning amendment is in contravention to this objective.

Perth and Peel @3.5 million[11] aims include:

Sustainable: Perth will responsibly manage its ecological footprint and live within its environmental constraints, while improving our connection with and enjoyment of the natural environment.

The proposed amendment undermines this aim.

Perth and Peel at 3.5 Million also stresses the increasing importance of foreshore beach reserves in the Central Sub-region as the population grows and density increases, to ensure amenity and liveability[12].

State Planning Policy 2.6[13] sets out the Government’s aim to:

protect, conserve and enhance coastal zone values, particularly in areas of landscape, biodiversity and ecosystem integrity, Indigenous and cultural significance.

More specifically, SPP 2.6[14] states that in terms of Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Planning, an area likely to be subject to coastal erosion in the next 100 years, development should be avoided.

The McGowan Government has recognized the importance of densification, particularly in areas with public transit access.  In particular, this approach emphasizes the importance of protecting existing vegetation and green space to ensure more dense suburbs remain cool and livable. 

Environmental Risk

 

The Environmental Protection Authority advice attached to the proposed amendment warns of the ecological risk of developing the land in question, as the site could provide potential ‘crucial’ habitat to the endangered Carnaby’s Black Cockatoos.  The bushland cover of Lot 556 and surrounds is critical as it is the last link in the chain of natural green areas linking the ocean to the river and to the Perth escarpment, for which there is no alternative.

There are known and potential endangered species and endangered ecological communities that rely on the vegetation provided by the green corridor and may be found in the 8000sqm.  These include:

Callitris preisii  (Rottnest Pine)

Melaleuca lanceolata  (Moonah Paperbark)

Angianthus micropodioides P3

Beyeria cygnorum P3

Neelaps calonotos (Black Striped Snake) P3

Isoodon obesulus (Quenda). Evidence of diggings have been observed on the site and in the vicinity. P4

 

The existence of these and other local native species form a healthy biodiverse community which will be gravely threatened if Lot 556 is rezoned for an urban development as this land contains most of the mature habitat native trees of the Leighton Beaches.

 

Conclusion

 

The reason given for rezoning to Urban is to facilitate sale of the land as it is ‘surplus to government need’.  The land was not zoned special purpose due to ‘government need’.  Rather State Planning Policy 2.6[15] sets out that land use, particularly of the coastal foreshore, should be determined on the optimal outcomes for the whole community. 

The rezoning of Lot 556 Curtin Avenue would represent a significant loss for the State.  Far greater benefit can be gained by preserving the open, natural amenity of the immediate surroundings and capitalizing on the long-term heritage and tourism value of the Lot. The creation of this additional Perth Tourism precinct, with associated jobs and economic benefit and the protection of a critical environmental corridor, heavily outweigh the short-term benefit of the cash sale of the land.

We strongly advocate that Lot 556 should retain its current MRS zoning of Public Purpose (Special Use), be transferred to the Crown as an ‘A’ class reserve and positioned to be vested in the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA). 

 

Bibliography

 

Basset, J, 2018, ‘Town of Mosman Park driven by safety concerns in burying of beach caves at Moondarup shark dreaming site’ in Western Suburbs Weekly, May 9.

 

Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (WA) and Western Australian Planning Commission, 2018, Perth and Peel at 3.5 million. Available at https://www.dplh.wa.gov.au/getmedia/404a6895-f6ec-4829-87df-8de5b80075b8/FUT-PP-Perth_and_Peel_Sub_Region_March2018_v2

Effects of natural environment on mental health: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyse

Abida Sultan, Qiping Fan, Rachit Sharma, Neetu Purohit, Dilruba Fatima Sharmin Md Mahbub Hossain

 

GHD, 2016,  Our Coastal Future: Leighton, Port and Mosman Beach Coastal Adaptation Plan, Prepared for Town of Mosman Park and City of Fremantle, available at https://www.fremantle.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/Port%20Leighton%20and%20Mosman%20Beaches%20Coastal%20Adaption%20Plan.pdf.

Town of Mosman Park, 2018, Town of Mosman Park Local Planning Scheme Number 3, available at https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2021-10/LPSC-Mosman-Park-Scheme-Text.pdf

Walley, T, (date unknown) Origins of Derbal Nara 1, Nyungar Wardan Katitjin Bidi – Derbal Nara, Curtin University, Available at https://www.derbalnara.org.au/origin-of-derbal-nara-1

 

Western Australian Planning Commission, 2013, State Planning Policy Number 2.6: State Coastal Planning Strategy, Available at https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2021-07/SPP-CST-SPP2-6_Policy.pdf